LANGUAGE SITUATION: DEFINITION AND RESEARCH APPROACHES

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48081/btouph3.2026/498-512
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article explores the structural and content-related aspects of defining a language situation, which is a central category in sociolinguistics. A language situation represents the hierarchy of language use within a specific administrative-territorial unit. As a system, a language situation consists of both permanent elements and variable components. While the elements of a language situation include the spheres of language use, its components are the languages themselves and their forms of existence. This study clarifies the classifications of language situations based on research in this field. The authors describe the language situation in Kazakhstan, relying on theoretical conclusions and established classifications. For the first time, the qualitative aspect of the language situation in Kazakhstan is revealed, identifying the number of languages that constitute the modern linguistic landscape and determining their functional domains. A classification of the actually functioning languages in the country is provided. One of the key issues discussed in the article is the nature of language existence forms, which are considered in sociolinguistics as linguistic states. The authors argue that the use of idioms (languages) encompasses various social spheres, each of which is served by different forms of language existence. Furthermore, the authors highlight the intensive development of translanguaging in Kazakhstan’s language situation, which is vividly manifested in people’s speech practices and urban epigraphy.