Environmental-economic accounting for sustainable water planning: A case study of water supply systems in Kazakhstan

HydroResearch, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.hydres.2026.09.003
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Kazakhstan faces growing water security challenges driven by climate variability, demographic pressures, and legacy infrastructure. This study applies the System of Environmental Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) framework to the Astana Reservoir, the primary water source for the capital city, to integrate ecosystem services into water planning. Using spatial analysis, hydrological monitoring, and valuation techniques, we quantified four key services—water supply, purification, erosion control, and recreation—and assessed their economic value through market pricing, avoided cost, and travel-cost methods. Results indicate annual ecosystem service values of USD 59.7–80.9 million, dominated by purification and water supply functions. Despite these contributions, declining storage capacity, sedimentation, and water quality trends threaten long-term sustainability. Stakeholder interviews indicate strong support for embedding ecosystem service valuation in policy to enhance transparency and resilience. The findings demonstrate SEEA-EA’s potential to inform evidence-based water governance in Kazakhstan and similar contexts.