Abstract
Background/Objectives: To evaluate an exploratory ordinal transabdominal ultrasonography score against a study-defined semiquantitative two-echo chemical-shift MRI pancreatic fat index ≥ 5%. Methods: This prospective paired diagnostic accuracy study included 150 adults aged 30–60 years with metabolic abnormalities or risk factors and technically adequate ultrasonography. A score ≥ 1 was the primary positive index-test result. Diagnostic accuracy, ROC AUC, and ordinal correspondence were evaluated. Results: After nine clinical exclusions, pancreatic ultrasonography was technically evaluable in 150 of 170 participants (88.2%; 95% CI, 82.5–92.3%). For the study-defined MRI index ≥ 5%, sensitivity was 76.8% (95% CI, 66.6–84.6%), specificity was 77.9% (95% CI, 66.7–86.2%), accuracy was 77.3% (95% CI, 70.0–83.3%), and AUC was 0.812 (95% CI, 0.748–0.876). Exact four-category agreement was 45.3%, and quadratically weighted kappa was 0.504 (95% CI, 0.387–0.612). Conclusions: These estimates describe agreement and discrimination relative to the study-defined two-echo MRI index in selected adults with metabolic risk and technically adequate ultrasonography. They should not be interpreted as diagnostic accuracy for histologically confirmed pancreatic steatosis or standardized MRI-PDFF-defined disease. The exploratory score is not a quantitative substitute for MRI and requires reproducibility assessment and external validation.