Unsustainable Survival and Intergenerational Memory in Family Conflicts Arising from the Gobonji Agribusiness of Central Asian Koreans

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18848/2327-0055/cgp/a274
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates the family conflicts and generational memory gaps triggered by Gobonji—a Korean agricultural business during the late Soviet era—which has traditionally been framed through narratives of pioneering success and socioeconomic achievement. By conducting oral history interviews with family members currently residing in Central Asia, the research illuminates the marginalized domestic crises and identity struggles hidden behind these dominant discourses. The findings reveal that for the parent generation, who endured Soviet oppression and forced assimilation, Gobonji served as a pragmatic means of achieving mainstream integration, despite the erosion of traditional values and social stigma. In contrast, the children’s generation, socialized within the formal Soviet system, perceived these unofficial spaces as socially isolating, unsustainable exploitation, and a manifestation of premodern hierarchical oppression. The study demonstrates that the parents’ survival strategy—centered on a “myth of family salvation” through mobilized labor—clashed profoundly with the socialist-influenced social memories of the children. This ideological and experiential disconnect ultimately transformed a socioeconomic survival mechanism into enduring relational trauma for the younger generation, highlighting the complex internal costs of the Korean diaspora’s economic adaptation in Central Asia.