Anthropometric Status, Menstrual Health, and Psychosocial Correlates Among 4251 Adolescent Girls in Kazakhstan: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study

А.К. Аязбеков, Aigul Terlikbayeva, S. Khaidarov, Gulzhan Baigazieva, Zh. A. Imanbayeva, Aliya Aimbetova, Аlmagul Kurmanova, Damilya Salimbayeva

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/healthcare14182918
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Menstrual health in adolescence is influenced by nutritional, developmental, and psychosocial factors, yet integrated school-based evidence from Central Asia is limited. We assessed recorded anthropometric, menstrual/reproductive, and psychosocial indicators among adolescent girls in southern Kazakhstan and evaluated factors associated with a prespecified composite menstrual/reproductive outcome. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of a non-public school health screening database containing 5197 participant records from 2025. After removal of 946 exact duplicate copies, 4251 unique records of girls aged 12-18 years remained. We present prevalence estimates with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) using modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors clustered by recorded school field. RESULTS: . The source form used fixed adult BMI categories; these are reported descriptively and are not interpreted as pediatric nutritional diagnoses. At least one non-reference menstrual or reproductive indicator was recorded in 24.1% of participants; severe menstrual pain and stress were each recorded in 6.9%. Stress was associated with any menstrual/reproductive abnormality (aPR 2.05, 95% CI 1.65-2.54) and with severe menstrual pain (aPR 3.27, 95% CI 2.39-4.46). Unsatisfactory nutrition was also associated with the composite outcome (aPR 1.64, 95% CI 1.35-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: Recorded menstrual/reproductive concerns were frequent in this screened sample, and stress showed consistent associations with menstrual outcomes. Because anthropometric categories were based on adult cut points and several screening items were not validated instruments, interpret the findings as descriptive and hypothesis-generating rather than as population prevalence or causal estimates.