Paleothermicity and hydrocarbons generation modelization in the eastern part of the Precaspian Basin and Pre-Uralian Basin (Kazakhstan)

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51301/ejsu.2026.i4.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The Precaspian basin is the main oil province in Kazakhstan, where there are such giant fields as Tengiz, Karachaganak, Astrakhan and Kashagan. In previous works have been identified source rocks associated mainly with the sub-salt complex. However, the issue of such parameters as the depth of the oil window remains unresolved, because the geothermal gradient is low and the studied source rocks have a low maturity. By the study of the organic matter in these sediments and simulation of genesis of hydrocarbons by Petromod 1D software (IES Gmbh; now Slb), we wanted to determine the depth range of oil window for essential source rocks. This area is composed of three parts from Devonian to late Carboniferous: the Precaspian Basin subdivided into a basin (claystones, mudstones and calciturbidites) and a platform (limestone and storm sandstones), and the Pre-Uralian Basin (turbidite sandstones). For the studied sector the values of the Ro are low and varies from 0.4 to 0.7 and Tmax lies between 420 and 445°C. The simulation of the heat flow was calibrated by Vitrinite reflectance with different kinetics according to the type of organic matter – Vandenbroucke et al. (1999)’s model was chosen for the type III (Brent) and for the type II (KCF). The low value of the heat gradient can be compensated by the geological duration during which source rock undergoes the transformation. In the sector studied the phase of generation of oil can correspond to the level of evaluation, corresponding to value 0.5% of Ro and even 0.4% for the algal type or mixed OM II/III. For the studied formations, the major part of hydrocarbons was generated from the maximal phase of burial. We can distinguish four zones in which the depths of the beginning and end of the oil window are different: the western zone (basin) from 4-4.5 km to 7-9 km, the zone of slope and border from 3-3.7 km to 4.5-5 km, the zone of Preuralian basin from 2.8-3.3 to 4.5-5 km, and the eastern zone under the thrust of Ural (Izembet) from 2-2.8 to 3.5-4 km.