Identification of the influence of tilt angle on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15587/1729-4061.2026.368264
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The object of the study is a water-based flat-plate solar collector operating under the sharply continental climatic conditions. The problem addressed is the insufficient justification of the installation angle and seasonal heat balance, which reduces the reliability of efficiency assessment in long cold periods. A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a collector with an aperture area of 1.88 m2, glass cover, aluminum absorber, and 12 copper riser tubes were developed and validated. Calculations were performed for average monthly meteorological conditions representing summer, transition, and winter regimes under long cold-season operation, south-facing orientation, and tilt angles of 10–90°.The model accounted for heat conduction in solid elements, laminar heat-carrier flow, natural convection in the air gap, radiative heat transfer, and losses through glass cover and casing. It was established that the rational fixed angle for year-round operation is 50–55°. With seasonal adjustment, 35–40° is recommended in summer and 60–70° in winter, increasing annual useful heat output by 8–12% without changing the collector design. The average thermal efficiency for 12 monthly regimes was 49.3%, while the solar-radiation-weighted efficiency was 57.6%. In winter, the glass cover is the main heat-loss pathway, through which 37–41% of incident solar radiation is lost. Validation using 78 measurement series confirmed agreement between calculated and experimental data: MAPE for efficiency was 7.52%, and R2 was 0.94. The results can be used to select the installation angle, evaluate seasonal heat output, and assess solar hot water and low-temperature heating systems operating under long cold-season conditions