OMISSION AS A TECHNIQUE INLITERARY TRANSLATION

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53360/3080-3861-2026-2(6)-7
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The modern challenges in translation studies require a scrutinized attitude toward the background and cultural specifics of the national literature to be translated into more dominant languages. The article highlights the problem of using definite techniques in transposing various linguistic units, referring to peculiar stylistic means applied by the author in his or her masterpiece. The study aims at discussing classes and gains in translation of psychological and emotive aspects of a national literary work.In particular, the relevance of omission as a technique is assessed in the Russian-English translation of the novel ‘’ by the prominent Kyrgyz writer Ch. Aitmatov, devoted to the global issue of the relationship between man and nature.