Children’s Language Use on the Playground: Peer Interaction and Language Policy in Practice in Kazakhstan

Languages, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/languages11090180
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines children’s language use in spontaneous playground interaction in Kazakhstan, focusing on how language choice varies across play activities and how these practices relate to family language orientations. The study uses non-participant observation and audio recordings of nine playgroup sessions involving 23 children aged 4–9, complemented by caregiver questionnaires. The analysis follows an interactional approach and uses qualitative coding in MAXQDA. The findings show variability in language use across the observed play sessions and communicative functions. In cooperative and structured play, Kazakh accounted for the largest proportion of coded utterances in both observed sessions, whereas competitive and physically oriented play showed a more variable distribution of Kazakh, Russian, and mixed-language utterances. At the utterance level, the strongest co-occurrence patterns for Kazakh were observed with agreement, initiation, and negotiation, whereas Russian showed stronger co-occurrence with accusation, claim, and protest. Comparison with caregiver reports shows partial correspondence between reported family language practices and observed playground language use, suggesting that peer language practices are not simply direct reflections of family language orientations. From a language policy perspective, the study shows that playgrounds constitute an important site where state and family language policy are enacted and negotiated in everyday practice. By focusing on children’s agency in informal peer settings, the study contributes to research on family language policy, language socialization, and language policy “from below”.