A MODEL FOR IMPROVING MANAGEMENT CONTROL IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINES CIRCULATION BASED ON KPIs AND DIGITAL TOOLS

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53511/pharmkaz.2026.4.8
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction. The quality of public regulation of medicines circulation depends on a management control system that ensures the timeliness, quality, and transparency of expert processes. Traditional reporting mainly records deviations after they have occurred, which creates a need for a model that enables early risk identification and supports data-driven decision-making. Methods. This was an applied project-based study. A systems approach, a process approach, analysis of regulatory and methodological documents, comparative review of international recommendations for strengthening regulatory systems, and management process modelling were used. Results. A three-level management control architecture comprising strategic, process, and operational levels was proposed. A set of indicators was developed covering timeliness, process duration, risk of deadline violation, first-pass quality, rework, data quality, implementation of corrective actions, workload balance, and the degree of automation. The structure of a management dashboard and a phased roadmap for implementation were developed. Discussion. The proposed model supports a shift from retrospective reporting control to early identification of deviations, root-cause analysis, and monitoring of management actions. KPIs should not replace professional expert judgement; target values should be set only after baseline measurement and pilot validation using actual data. Keywords: management control, KPI, digital transformation, medicines, regulatory system, dashboard, Business Intelligence, process management, NCEMMD