Exon-skipping therapies for DMD in Kazakhstan: Progress and challenges

Altynshash Jaxybayeva, Bakhytkul Myrzaliyeva, Marzhan Lepessova, Latina Tekebayeva, Dinmukhamed Nurniyazovich Ayaganov

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/22143602261476365
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

BackgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) progression has been evaluated in clinical trials; however, some ethnic populations-including Kazakhstan, a country with a genetically unique population-are still underrepresented. While the prevalence of DMD in Kazakhstan has yet to be reported, Kazakhstan is one of the only central Asian countries with access to exon-skipping therapies for DMD. Although these therapies have been provided through regional budget and public funds since 2021, due to high costs and inconsistent support, accessibility remains challenging.ObjectiveTo describe the disease progression of exon-skipping-treated patients with DMD in Kazakhstan and discuss treatment management challenges.MethodsData from exon-skipping-treated patients (January 2021-April 2025) were provided to an expert council for review every 6 months. Functional outcomes (Scott scale, Vignos scale, 6-minute walk test, and 4-stair climb) were extracted and analyzed.ResultsA total of 46 patients received eteplirsen (n = 24), golodirsen (n = 14), and casimersen (n = 8). Median ages at eteplirsen, golodirsen, and casimersen initiation were 9.1, 9.6, and 10.3 years, respectively. During the follow-up period, 10 of 46 patients discontinued their exon-skipping therapy, and one patient died (decompensated cardiomyopathy). Functional assessments showed that patients were generally stable or improved over time. Approximately one-third of patients experienced treatment interruptions or were anticipated to be unable to maintain their prescribed exon-skipping therapy due to inadequate funding.ConclusionsThese data reflect the challenges patients with DMD experience in Kazakhstan, and the need for improved funding to maximize the therapeutic potential of exon-skipping therapies.