Language gains in children with ASD: a study of adapted ABA-based lexical-semantic intervention

Frontiers in Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1803781
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a linguistically and culturally adapted Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) intervention targeting lexical-semantic language development in preschool children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Kazakhstan. Sixty children aged 3-6 were allocated to an experimental group receiving the adapted ABA program or a control group receiving routine high-intensity VB-MAPP-informed ABA therapy. The intervention incorporated discrete trial teaching and naturalistic learning across 720 instructional hours over nine months. Lexical-semantic outcomes were assessed using a linguistically adapted assessment instrument, and data were analyzed through a 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA with age and gender as covariates. Results revealed significant main effects of Time [ F (1, 56) = 84.73, p < .001] and Group [ F (1, 56) = 7.92, p = .007], as well as a strong Group×Time interaction [ F (1, 56) = 18.56, p < .001, η ² = .25], demonstrating greater gains in the experimental group. Qualitative findings further suggested improvements in word production, semantic categorization, and vocabulary generalization, while persistent difficulties remained in abstract and relational term use. Given the non-randomized design and the link between group assignment and institutional site, the findings should be interpreted as preliminary quasi-experimental evidence of intervention-associated lexical-semantic gains rather than as definitive causal evidence.