Humus quantity and quality control macro- and micronutrient availability in arid and semi-arid calcic soils

Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/s44447-026-00188-y
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Calcic Chernozem and Light Calcic Calcisol are important agricultural soils of Kazakhstan’s steppe and arid zones. This study evaluated the relationships between humus quantity, humus fractional composition, and macro- and micronutrient availability in four contrasting agricultural soil profiles. Total humus content, humic- and fulvic-acid fractions, exchangeable cations, available macronutrients, DTPA-extractable Cu, Mn, Fe, Mo, and Co, and hot-water-extractable B were determined. The Calcic Chernozem profiles had higher total humus contents, reaching 3.81% in the surface horizon, and a greater relative contribution of humic-acid fractions, with Cₕₐ/C𝒻ₐ ratios of 1.2–2.0. In the Light Calcic Calcisol, surface-horizon humus contents ranged from 1.05 to 1.45%, while fulvic-acid fractions predominated, with ΣFA reaching 73.2% and CHA/CFA ratios of 0.1–0.2. Macro- and micronutrient concentrations varied markedly among profiles and horizons. Particularly low concentrations of hot-water-extractable B and DTPA-extractable Fe were observed in the Light Calcic Calcisol. Exploratory correlation analysis and PCA identified associations among humus fractions, soil chemical properties, and nutrient distribution. The first two principal components explained 82.5% of the total variance in the Calcic Chernozem and 84.5% in the Light Calcic Calcisol. Because each soil–management combination was represented by one field profile and the sites differed in climate, crop rotation, irrigation, fertilizer management, land-use history, and sampling date, the observed patterns should be interpreted cautiously. The findings support soil-specific fertility management focused on maintaining soil organic matter and assessing potential B and Fe deficiencies in low-humus calcareous soils.