Selected Formal Thought Disorder Phenomena in Acute Inpatients with Primary and Secondary Psychotic Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study

Psychiatry International, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/psychiatryint7050188
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Formal thought disorder (FTD) is classically associated with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, but speech disorganization may also occur in other acute psychotic conditions. This study compared eight prespecified FTD phenomena between operationally defined primary and secondary psychotic disorders. In this single-center cross-sectional study, 93 adults admitted with an acute psychotic state to three psychiatric inpatient departments were classified as having primary psychotic disorders (F20/F23.2; n = 51) or secondary psychotic disorders (F06.2/F10.5/F15.5; n = 42). Eight phenomena derived from Andreasen’s descriptions were rated using study-specific 0–2 ordinal anchors. Item-level distributions were analyzed using exact tests with Benjamini–Hochberg correction and covariate-adjusted ordinal regression; composite and diagnostic-subgroup analyses were exploratory. Higher ratings in the primary group were observed for derailment, tangentiality, incoherence, neologisms, and clanging, whereas loss of goal, circumstantiality, and perseveration did not differ statistically. Adjusted models supported the same item-level pattern, and sensitivity analyses supported several principal findings. The exploratory composite was also higher in the primary group (median 10 [8–10.5] vs. 7 [6–8]; p < 0.001). These findings support cautious, descriptive phenomenon-level assessment across acute psychotic disorders but do not validate the framework as a diagnostic instrument or establish disorder-specific FTD profiles.