Assessment of the efficiency of occupational safety and health cost allocation: Empirical analysis of work disability dynamics

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21833/ijaas.2026.07.013
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency of occupational safety and health costs and their impact on work disability dynamics. Despite increasing investments in occupational safety, the effectiveness of cost allocation remains insufficiently evaluated, particularly from an accounting and analytical perspective. The study is based on statistical data from medical and social expertise in Kazakhstan for 2020–2025 and financial data from six enterprises in the mining, manufacturing, construction, and transport sectors for 2020–2024. It is assumed that different categories of occupational safety and health costs have different effects on work disability outcomes. A quantitative approach was applied using correlation and linear regression analyses to assess the relationship between cost structure and changes in work disability indicators. The results show a predominantly negative relationship between occupational safety and health costs and work disability levels. The strongest correlations were identified for infrastructure investments (up to −0.57), workplace certification (−0.46), and personal protective equipment-related costs (up to −0.47). Regression results indicate that targeted costs show stronger associations (R² = 0.48) than general costs (R² = 0.21), which show weak and statistically inconsistent relationships. The findings indicate that the efficiency of occupational safety and health costs depends not only on their total volume but also on their structure and allocation. The study contributes to accounting and auditing by providing an empirical approach for evaluating cost efficiency and supporting evidence-based resource allocation decisions.