ARMED UPRISINGS IN THE EAST OF THE KAZAKH SSR AS A RESULT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHALLENGES

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53360/3107-0493-2025-2(4)-2
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the socio-economic and demographic consequences of collectivization and dekulakization policies in Kazakhstan, focusing on the Eastern region. A comparison of census data from 1926 and 1939 reveals a sharp decline in the Kazakh population due to famine, mass migration, and changes in the ethnodemographic structure. Archival materials enable an analysis of the scale of resettlement to China, the increase in the number of orphaned children, mortality rates, as well as the forms and methods of peasant resistance to the coercive policies of the Soviet authorities. Special attention is given to armed uprisings and mass migrations, including the Tolstoukhov Rebellion of 1930, its organizational features, slogans, and the role of its leader, Fyodor Tolstoukhov. It is shown that despite official classifications of these protest movements as «kulak-bandit formations», middle peasants and poor peasants also participated in them. The methods of suppression by the OGPU – including punitive operations, intelligence work, repressions, and the division of insurgent groups – are analyzed in detail. The study concludes that peasant resistance in Eastern Kazakhstan was driven by the destruction of the traditional structure of rural society, forced collectivization, and the confiscation of property, which gave the protests a mass and spontaneous character.