Regional economic elites in Kazakhstan as a pressure group

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/1060586x.2026.2718893
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines the institutionalized mechanisms of corporate lobbying within the industrial regions of Kazakhstan, specifically focusing on the Pavlodar, Aktobe, and East Kazakhstan provinces. Using a qualitative multi-case study approach complemented by quantitative content analysis, the research investigates how regional economic elites influence local governance through the Atameken National Chamber of Entrepreneurs and local maslikhats. Analysis of membership data from the 2024–2025 period reveals an extensive level of business representation in formal representative bodies, with participation rates reaching 64.7% in Aktobe and 59.4% in East Kazakhstan. The findings demonstrate a strategic agenda control mechanism where business-centric economic issues are prioritized while sensitive social and ecological topics are systematically excluded from institutional dialogue. This power through silence reinforces a symbiotic relationship between regional administrations and business elites, effectively marginalizing broader public interests through a process of institutional capture. By conceptualizing the workers-business-administration triangle and the role of symbolic capital, the study provides new empirical evidence of how interest representation has evolved in Kazakhstan’s post-January 2022 political landscape. Ultimately, the research offers critical insights into the dynamics of regional elite encapsulation and the ongoing challenges of achieving inclusive governance in a transitional regime.