Қазақстандағы шетелдік инвестицияларды құқықтық қорғауды қамтамасыз етудегі институционалдық және құқықтық мәселелер: халықаралық және ұлттық реттеу тетіктерін талдау

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54649/2077-9860-2026-2-60-73
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the problem of determining the place of environmental law within the legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the basis of a systemic and structural analysis. The author substantiates the need to distinguish between the primary and secondary structures of law. Within the primary structure, the system-forming factor is the division into public and private law, while the criterion for differentiating branches is the method of legal regulation – imperative for public branches and dispositive for private ones. Within the secondary structure, four spheres of activity are identified – economic, socio-cultural, administrative-political, and environmental – which serve as system-forming factors for complex branches of law. It is demonstrated that the environmental sphere occupies a unique position, as the notions of a sphere of activity and a branch of law coincide within it. Based on an analysis of the Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2021) and relevant doctrinal approaches, the author proposes to consider environmental law as an integrated branch encompassing natural resource law and environmental protection law as sub-branches. At the same time, land, subsoil, water, and forest law are recognized as independent complex branches forming part of the structure of natural resource law. The introduction of the category of an integrated branch makes it possible to resolve theoretical contradictions between the classical three-level structure of law and the actual practice of regulating environmental relations. The proposed concept opens prospects for revising the systematization of other complex legal formations and may be extrapolated to entrepreneurial, information, and other cross-sectoral legal institutions.