Clostridioides difficile Infection in Central Asia: Current Evidence, Molecular Epidemiology, and Surveillance Priorities—A Narrative Review

Pathogens, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/pathogens15080853
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhoea and a marker of antimicrobial exposure and healthcare quality, yet Central Asia is almost absent from the indexed literature. We reviewed available evidence on CDI epidemiology, antimicrobial use and molecular typing across Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar and accessible regional sources, and identified priorities for surveillance development. The retrievable evidence is sparse and fragmented. The strongest direct data came from Uzbekistan, where paediatric cohorts documented toxigenic C. difficile in up to 47% of the aetiological structure of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in early-aged children. Nationwide surveys in Kazakhstan showed substantial antimicrobial use (38.2–40.2% of inpatients) and measurable healthcare-associated infection burdens (2.4–3.8%), indicating environments in which CDI may go unrecognised. No national CDI surveillance, ribotyping or resistance-gene data were identified for any of the five countries, whereas evidence from China, Thailand and other Asian settings indicates that ribotype 017 (sequence type 37) predominates in those countries. This absence appears more consistent with underdiagnosis, fragmented reporting and limited laboratory capacity than with true absence of disease. Sentinel surveillance, standardised diagnostic algorithms, integration with antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention programmes, and regional typing collaborations are the practical priorities.