Accurate path loss modeling and angular temporal characterization of outdoor mmWave channels across multi-frequency bands in 5G mobile network

Scientific Reports, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63317-1
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Accurate path loss modeling is essential to capture the unique characteristics of outdoor millimeter-wave (mmWave) propagation. This study analyzes the outdoor propagation path loss of mmWave signals at 28, 38, 66, 71, and 90 GHz in three urban locations in Istanbul, Turkey, using Ray Tracing (RT) simulations for both Line of Sight (LOS) and Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) conditions. Four large-scale empirical path loss models were examined: the Close In (CI) free-space reference distance model, the Floating Intercept (FI) model, the CI model with frequency dependence (CIF), and the Alpha–Beta–Gamma (ABG) model. Results show that the path loss exponent fluctuated between 2.35 and 2.86 in LOS and 2.54–3.3 in NLOS scenarios, with standard deviation of 3–11.79 dB. The FI model achieved the lowest errors values in LOS conditions, while ABG and CIF delivered comparable accuracy under NLOS and multi-frequency conditions. Also, angular and temporal analysis showed that angles of arrival (AoA) and delay metrics are very important for how mmWave channels behavior. In urban streets, the maximum AoA ranged from − 0.99 rad to + 3.14 rad, and in open squares, it ranged from − 2.58 rad to + 1.66 rad. This shows that multipath dispersion is stronger at lower frequencies and in open spaces.