Abstract
This article examines cultural and humanitarian cooperation in Central Asia as a politically meaningful field of competition among China, Russia and the United States. The argument developed here is that cultural diplomacy in the region should not be read as a harmless extension of friendship, nor as a mechanism that automatically converts attraction into geopolitical loyalty. It works through concrete institutional channels: language policy, scholarships, university partnerships, expert forums, heritage projects, development narratives and public diplomacy. The study is based on a qualitative comparative analysis of academic literature, official statements and publicly available policy materials from 2013 to 2025. The analysis identifies three partly overlapping models of influence. China links cultural cooperation to the Belt and Road logic of connectivity, modernization and people-to-people exchange. Russia relies on historical memory, Russian-language infrastructure and post-Soviet institutional continuity, although this model has become more contested after 2022. The United States frames its engagement through sovereignty, resilience, educational exchange, English-language competence and the C5+1 platform. The article concludes that Central Asian statesare not passive recipients of external rivalry. Their multi-vector diplomacy turns cultural and humanitarian cooperation into an arena of selective bargaining, where external soft-power projects are accepted, adapted or limited according to domestic priorities, social expectations and sovereignty concerns.