Development of emotional empathy in future educators during the process of professional formation

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11591/ijere.v15i4.38074
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the structural components of empathy among students majoring in pedagogical disciplines and to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program designed to foster empathy during their professional training. The study involved 120 undergraduate students from two Kazakhstani universities enrolled in creative fields. An experimental approach was adopted in the research. To assess empathy levels, validated questionnaires and psychodiagnostics scales were used. The results of statistical analysis indicated that empathy levels did not significantly change following the completion of the empathy enhancement program. The mean scores across all measurement tools shifted only marginally, and the t-statistics and p-values (p>0.05) pointed to a lack of statistically significant differences. Additionally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not reveal any significant differences in the cognitive (F=0.42, p=0.53), emotional (F=0.38, p=0.54), or behavioral (F=0.31, p=0.58) dimensions of empathy. These findings may be attributed to senior students already possessing a relatively high level of empathy, making further development within a short-term program more challenging. The practical significance of the study lies in its in-depth analysis of students’ empathy levels.