Competency-based evaluation of scientific-pedagogical master’s programs

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11591/ijere.v15i4.37191
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the master’s degree programs at the Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University from the perspective of the competency-based approach. The study involves a targeted sample of 120 participants directly involved in the implementation and evaluation of scientific and pedagogical master’s programs: 70 master’s students, 20 teachers, 20 graduates, and 10 employers. The study employs a mixed-method approach, including surveys of master’s degree students, faculty members, graduates, and employers, as well as qualitative analysis of interviews with participants. Course relevance received the highest rating. Faculty members positively evaluate the alignment of the programs with the competency-based approach. Graduates emphasize the applicability of their knowledge, while employers express satisfaction with the graduates’ level of preparation. Kruskal–Wallis test analysis does not reveal statistically significant differences between groups for most indicators, confirming a consistent perception of educational quality. The interviews reveal a generally positive attitude toward the programs but highlighted several shortcomings, such as uneven competency development, insufficient practical focus, and limited engagement with the professional environment. The novelty of the work lies in the comprehensive empirical evaluation of master’s programs based on a competency-based approach from the perspectives of students, teachers, graduates, and employers. The practical significance of the findings lies in justifying the need for stronger integration of theory and practice, greater transparency in competency assessment, and expanded collaboration with employers to enhance the quality of master’s degree training.