Analysis and prospects for the integration of modern methods of remote geodetic monitoring of man-made structures

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.56195/20793332-2026-26-3-68-73
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The increasing scale of mining operations and anthropogenic impact on the geological environment make it necessary to ensure the safety of complex engineering structures such as open pits and spoil heaps. Deformation processes at these sites are highly dynamic and require rapid and accurate monitoring of their spatial position. Therefore, improving geodetic monitoring methods remains a priority research and practical task. This study aims to analyses the current state of remote geodetic monitoring methods for technogenic objects, identify their limitations, and determine promising directions for further development. A review and comparative analysis of domestic and international publications was carried out for satellite technologies, ground-based laser scanning (GLS), unmanned aerial systems, and satellite radar interferometry. The analysis showed that each method has specific advantages and limitations. GNSS provides high accuracy but is limited to discrete observation points. GLS delivers high-precision digital data for the visible surface of an object but is constrained by measurement range and survey conditions. UAS provide detailed areal information but are limited by observation frequency and accuracy. InSAR enables retrospective deformation analysis but is affected by atmospheric and geometric distortions. None of the considered methods is universal; therefore, their integrated application is the most promising direction.