Abstract
The late 2010s signaled a decisive shift in Uzbekistan’s political trajectory, as the country adopted a new approach to Central Asian regionalism. This study compares the Karimov and Mirziyoyev presidencies to show how changes in foreign policy discourse encapsulates broader transformations in governance, identity, and national priorities. Particular attention is given to their contrasting leadership styles and approaches to regional integration. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, this study traces key narratives in the foreign policy discourse of both leaders. While there are notable similarities in their rhetoric, especially regarding Central Asia’s shared identity and Uzbekistan’s role in regional integration, the findings highlight significant differences in practice. Whereas Karimov prioritized sovereignty over engagement with multilateral structures, Mirziyoyev emphasized multilateral cooperation while simultaneously addressing domestic challenges