Designing a readiness profile for future teachers to solve research tasks in professional activity

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30853/ped20260167
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of the research is to design a readiness profile for future teachers to solve research tasks based on a diagnostic survey of students in pedagogical specialties at two universities. The article examines approaches to the concept of "profile" in Russian and foreign pedagogical science and substantiates the logic of its design based on the concept of pedagogical design by V. S. Bezrukova. The readiness profile of future teachers to solve research tasks is represented by six indicators reflecting the operational and value-semantic components of readiness to solve research tasks and is implemented in the form of an original self-assessment checklist consisting of 24 statements. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that the readiness of future teachers to solve research tasks is described through the correlation of value-semantic and operational indicators; on this basis, the advanced formation of indicators related to the acceptance of research as a professional norm was revealed in comparison with indicators of proficiency in research actions. As a result of the study, it was established that indicators related to the acceptance of research as a professional norm and interest in finding solutions are more pronounced than indicators reflecting proficiency in research actions, flexibility in their choice, and bringing the solution to a result. This ratio is repeated in two universities and shows a steady trend: value-semantic foundations of readiness are formed earlier, whereas the operational side requires longer and specially organized pedagogical work.