Microlegalities in Motion: Kazakh Emigrants Between Formal Rules and Informal Orders

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-20037-2_10
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This chapter examines how Kazakhstani labour migrants navigate heterogeneous legal and political environments in Western and non-Western migration destinations. Drawing on twenty-three qualitative interviews with Kazakh migrants working in the United Kingdom, United States, Turkey and South Korea, I show that migrants’ lived experiences of legality transcend formal regime classifications. Regardless of whether they encounter democratic, transparent, rule-of-law institutions or hybrid/non-democratic, informalised governance systems, migrants rely on a combination of formal rules and socially embedded informal practices to sustain mobility, access employment and avoid legal vulnerability. I conceptualise these adaptive repertoires as microlegalities: emergent, small-scale, socially distributed normative orders migrants construct and mobilise to interpret, supplement or navigate formal law. The chapter situates these practices within the broader political economy of Kazakhstan’s migration system, shaped by long-standing mobility traditions, contemporary labour-market drivers, state regulation, fraudulent recruitment schemes and diasporic infrastructures. I argue that microlegalities constitute an essential yet overlooked dimension of migration governance, revealing how migrants themselves co-produce functioning legal orders within opaque regulatory landscapes across political regime types.