Artificial Intelligence Enabled Accounting Innovation and Strategic Decision Making in Modern Enterprises

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47297/wspcewsp2516-251912.20261003
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is pulling the accounting function away from its traditional role as a backward-looking record keeper and toward a forward-looking part in enterprise strategy. This paper asks how that shift, AI-enabled accounting innovation, actually bears on strategic decision making in modern enterprises. Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective and a synthesis of recent scholarship and industry evidence, we build a conceptual framework that links AI technologies, accounting innovation, information quality, and decision outcomes, with data governance and human oversight as the conditions that determine how much of the potential is realized. The evidence indicates that machine learning, natural language processing, robotic process automation, and predictive analytics improve the timeliness, accuracy, and reach of accounting information, and through that improvement support faster and better-informed strategic choices. Reported gains are concrete: sizable reductions in manual error, faster closes, stronger anomaly detection, and more accurate forecasts. Yet the value is conditional. It depends on the quality of the underlying data, on the transparency of the algorithms, and, above all, on whether accountants are reskilled from custodians of records into strategic advisers. AI, we argue, is not a replacement for managerial judgement but the enabling layer of a hybrid decision architecture in which algorithmic output and human reasoning work together and accountability stays human.