CONTINUITY OF MILYUTIN'S PRINCIPLES IN MODERN URBAN PLANNING STANDARDS OF KAZAKHSTAN: ANALYSIS, ISSUES, AND REFORM PERSPECTIVES

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51885/3134-8041_jacs_2026_2_12
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article investigates the phenomenon of the persistence of N.A. Milyutin’s urban planning principles, formulated in the "Sotsgorod" concept, within the modern regulatory framework of Kazakhstan. The relevance of the work is due to the critical contradiction between Astana's need for sustainable development and the preservation of outdated Soviet-era regulations. Based on a detailed comparative analysis of Soviet (SNiP 2.07.01-89) and current (SNiP RK 3.01-01As-2021) standards, the authors prove that thefundamental city structure the microdistrict, rigid functional zoning, and fixed service radii remains unchanged. It is established that modern adjustments are limited to tightening quantitative indicators, ignoring the qualitative transformation of the environment. This preserves problems of commuting, fragmentation of green spaces, and high car dependency. The conclusion justifies the need for a fundamental reform of the planning system: a transition from directive rationing to flexible parametric modelsthat encourage mixed-use development and social diversity.