CALIBER: A Reliability-aware Information-analytical System for Composite material Strength Prediction with Cross-dataset Validation

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.22266/ijies2026.0831.50
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Machine learning accelerates composite-material design by predicting mechanical properties from composition, reducing costly physical testing.Conventional models return a single value with no indication of its trustworthiness, and the reliability tools that could supply this, namely conformal intervals and domain-of-applicability detectors, are seldom tested for transfer to a new material.This paper presents CALIBER, a reliability-aware system that augments a gradient-boosting core with conformal prediction intervals and a domain-of-applicability detector, and introduces a novelty-error coupling criterion: a pre-deployment test that determines, from calibration data alone, whether a domain detector will be informative for a dataset.CALIBER is evaluated on two cementitious composite datasets, 1,005 concrete mixtures and 307 steel-fibre-reinforced concrete specimens, under a leakage-free protocol.Consistent with the criterion, the conformal interval transfers between the two datasets whereas the domain detector does not, because the steel-fibre-reinforced concrete error is governed by one physical variable rather than featurespace novelty.