From coal biodesulfurization to mine-soil remediation: a critical review of microbial sulfur transformation in coal-impacted environments

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1888081
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Coal biodesulfurization has traditionally been regarded as a pre-combustion clean-coal technology; however, its connections to sulfur cycling and remediation in coal-impacted soils have not been sufficiently integrated. This review addresses this gap by examining microbial sulfur transformations in coal, coal gangue, mine spoil, acid mine drainage systems, and reclaimed soils. The discussion encompasses pyritic sulfur biooxidation, organic sulfur biotransformation, sulfate reduction and metal sulfide precipitation, rhizosphere-mediated sulfur cycling, and the reuse of coal mine solid wastes in reclamation contexts. Drawing on these lines of evidence, the review proposes a systems-level, risk-controlled sulfur management framework that conceptualizes coal treatment and mine-soil remediation as interconnected microbial, mineral, hydrological, and ecological processes. The synthesis demonstrates that sulfur-transforming microorganisms may facilitate sulfur removal, waste stabilization, and vegetation recovery, or alternatively promote acidification, sulfate export, and metal mobilization. These outcomes depend on factors such as matrix accessibility, oxygen exposure, redox stability, hydrologic connectivity, buffering capacity, sulfur loading, and labile carbon availability. Future research should progress beyond isolated microbial screening and instead prioritize matrix-aware, field-validated, and risk-based strategies that integrate sulfur mass balance, contaminant mobility, and long-term reclamation performance.