Between global agendas and local legacies: sustainability engagement in Kazakhstan’s higher education policy

2026

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/13504622.2026.2698665
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Global policy agendas for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) increasingly shape higher education systems worldwide. In transitional contexts, however, these agendas are mediated by historical legacies, geopolitical pressures, and competing national priorities, resulting in uneven and context-specific patterns of policy engagement. This paper examines how Kazakhstan’s higher education policies engage with global ESD discourses through a qualitative content analysis of national and institutional policy documents. The findings indicate a pattern of partial and fragmented alignment, where ESD-related values and competencies are present but lack a coherent conceptual framework or clear integration into educational purposes. This pattern is conceptualised as a drift model of policy engagement, characterised by unanchored adaptation to external policy agendas alongside the persistence of internal path dependencies. Drawing on postcolonial perspectives and theories of policy diffusion, the analysis shows how global sustainability discourses are incorporated into policy language while remaining weakly anchored in local epistemic and institutional contexts. The paper contributes to debates on global policy borrowing and higher education governance by proposing the drift model as a way of understanding how sustainability agendas are integrated in transitional systems. It also highlights the need for more contextually grounded approaches to ESD that move beyond symbolic alignment toward more coherent and transformative integration.