GEOSPATIAL MODELING OF GROUNDWATER POTENTIAL USING XGBoost, SHAP AND REMOTE SENSING DATA: A CASE STUDY OF THE BOKEYORDA DISTRICT OF WEST KAZAKHSTAN

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52269/skvc2621177
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this study, a machine learning model for spatially predicting groundwater potential was developed using the XGBoost classifier, trained on 15 consistent geospatial predictors derived from topographic, hydrological, vegetation, and hydrogeological datasets. A total of 202 wells with measured groundwater discharge were used as training samples and converted into categorical groundwater productivity classes. The model integrates raster data from multiple sources, including elevation derived from SRTM, terrain indices (slope, TWI), hydrological distance measures, seasonal vegetation and moisture indices (NDVI, NDWI, BSI), and lithological and hydraulic properties derived from GLHYMPS. The interpretability of the model was assessed using SHAP analysis to quantify the contribution of each predictor to groundwater potential estimates. Furthermore, prediction uncertainty was quantified using the Shannon entropy of class probabilities, which enabled the identification of low-confidence zones associated with hydrogeological transitions. The results show that the model captures significant spatial patterns in groundwater potential, despite moderate prediction accuracy during spatial validation (F1 score ≈ 0.24). High uncertainty values ​​are concentrated in structurally complex and lithologically heterogeneous zones. The proposed framework demonstrates a reproducible and transferable approach to integrating machine learning and geospatial analysis for mapping groundwater potential in data-deficient regions.