THE EVOLUTION OF IDEOLOGEMES IN POLITICAL MEDIA DISCOURSE: A LINGUO-COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BRITISH AND KAZAKH PRESS

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48081/bgqf1979
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to a linguocognitive analysis of the evolution of ideologues in the political media discourse of Great Britain and Kazakhstan in the period 2020-2024. The purpose of the study is to identify key ideologemes, their conceptual and evaluative characteristics, as well as to analyze their role in shaping the national political picture of the world. The empirical basis of the work was a corpus of texts from leading media outlets (The Guardian, BBC News, The Times; Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, Lit, Tengrinews), selected according to the criteria of political orientation and the presence of ideologues under study. The research uses methods of content analysis, lexico-semantic and cognitive-metaphorical analysis, as well as frame modeling. The results show that the British media discourse is focused on crisis-conflict narratives, where ideologems acquire a negative value and are accompanied by metaphors of struggle and threats. The Kazakh media space is dominated by ideologies of stability, modernization and unity, creating a positive image of the state as a guarantor of sustainable development. The revealed features indicate that the language in politics not only reflects reality, but also structures its perception, setting the audience certain scenarios for interpreting social changes. The results of the study may be useful for further work in the field of political linguistics, media communications and comparative analysis of discursive practices from different countries.