ENGLISH TEACHERS’ATTITUDES TOWARD TRANSLANGUAGING AS A DIMENSION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59787/2413-5488-2026-54-2-68-82
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Translanguaging, as a dynamic use of many languages to assist learning, has been gathering attention since the rise of multilingual education. However, research on its role in enhancing teachers’professional competence is limited, particularly in southern Kazakhstani state schools. The current study examines the teacher’s understanding, attitudes, classroom practices, and beliefs about institutional and personal policiesof English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in 5 state secondary schools in southern Kazakhstan. 16 teachers participated in a structured written interviews, which were analysed using qualitative analysis in MaxQDA. The findings show that the majority of instructors are knowledgeable with translanguaging and have generally positive opinions about using students’native tongues to improve understanding, confidence, and cognitive development. In spite of the fact that institutional English-only policies and insufficient expertise with some languages provide problems, teachers reported strategically using translanguaging in scaffolding, brainstorming, and explanation of complex topics. The research implies the need for professional development and policy changes that balance multilingual pedagogy with institutional expectations by accentuating a discrepancy between ideal teaching philosophies and actual classroom practice.