AI-Driven Recruitment: Efficiency, Ethics, and Human Judgment

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3233/faia260567
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping recruitment by automating resume screening, candidate evaluation, and workforce planning. AI tools reduce costs and manual workload while improving decision-making through predictive analytics and natural language processing. This study compares traditional workflows with AI-enhanced applicant tracking systems (ATS) to show how AI improves hiring accuracy and supports long-term talent strategies. Yet, these benefits raise ethical and operational concerns, including bias, privacy risks, and compliance with the EU AI Act and GDPR. Drawing on empirical evidence, the paper evaluates these challenges and proposes mitigation strategies such as adversarial debiasing, federated learning, and bias audits. Finally, it advances a hybrid model that combines AI efficiency with human oversight, ensuring fairness, transparency, and sound judgment in recruitment.