Key Factors Shaping Career Choice among Kazakhstani School Students

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/3080-1710-2026-155-2-212-224
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the multifactorial system that determines the choice of career trajectories among senior high school students in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In the context of global economic instability, labor market transformation, and reforms in the national education system, the process of career guidance among young people acquires particular significance for the development of high-quality human capital. The study is based on the integration of career development theories, including Frank Parsons’ concept of “rational choice” and Itamar Gati’s contemporary decision-making models, adapted to the socio-cultural context of Kazakhstan. The empirical basis of the research consists of survey data. The study provides a detailed examination of the complex dynamics between internal motivational factors, interests, and self-efficacy, and external determinants such as parental influence, the system of state educational grants, and socio-economic status. Special attention is given to trends in grant limitations, inequalities between urban and rural schools, as well as the growing migration intentions among academically successful students, reflecting the outflow of intellectual potential. The findings reveal profound contradictions between students’ publicly declared autonomy and the actual dependence of their career choices on institutional and family factors, highlighting the need to reconsider approaches to career guidance at the state level.