DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE: NEW MODELS IN THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SPACE

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-678x-2026-155-2-70-88
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines digital transformation of scientific discourse from the perspective of new models in information and communication space. The study aims to identify structural, linguistic, and multimodal characteristics of scientific texts in digital format using content analysis of ten scientific articles published in Kazakh in humanities and social sciences, published in 2023-2025 online in journals listed by the Committee for Quality Assurance in Science and Higher Education of Kazakhstan. The study coded parameters such as thematic area, annotation and keyword system, compositional structure of the text, terminological consistency, geography of sources, frequency of use of visual elements (tables, diagrams, illustrations) and hyperlinks, and conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis. The study found that the IMRAD-based model is preserved in digital scientific discourse in Kazakh, but the text acquired a networked and interactive character due to open access, DOIs, online platform capabilities, and multimodal components. A number of articles noted incomplete use of hypertext links and visual tools in the digital format, inconsistency in presentation of sources, and violations of linguistic norms. The results helped to assess the level of scientific discourse digital modernization in the national linguistic space and describe new models of scientific communication in information and communication space.