The Form of Aesthetic Understanding

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayag014
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract What does a person understand when she understands an artwork? In this article I propose to model aesthetic understanding—understanding of a particular work in terms of its particular aesthetic character—on our understanding of another person’s intentional action. Following Anscombe’s account of action explanation in Intention (2000 [1957]), to understand another’s intentional action is to grasp a teleological order or structure that relates what the person does to why they are doing it and how they are getting it done. Similarly, to understand an artwork is to grasp an implementational order that relates what aesthetic features an artwork possesses, how these features are implemented in the work, and why the work, with those features, has whatever aesthetic value they lend to it. I motivate this conception of aesthetic understanding by arguing that it makes good sense of the explanatory demands we place upon aesthetic expertise.