SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR ADHESIVE SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-ARM MULTICENTER STUDY

Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64854/2790-1289-2026-52-2-04
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Relevance. Adhesive small bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency associated with substantial morbidity and frequently requires operative treatment. Although multi-port laparoscopy is widely accepted, evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Materials and Methods. This was a retrospective, multicenter, single-arm observational study conducted from April 2018 to October 2025 and included 91 patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. All patients were operated on by one surgeon laparoscopically using the single-port technique (single-port laparoscopic surgery). The effectiveness of single-port laparoscopic surgery was assessed by analyzing operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, incision length, and intraoperative blood loss. Results. In this selected cohort, all 91 patients underwent SPLS without conversion to multi-port laparoscopy or open surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 5.5 % (95 % CI: 1.8–12.4). Favorable outcomes were likely associated with careful patient selection and surgeon expertise, despite the technical challenges of the single-port approach. These findings suggest that SPLS may be a feasible minimally invasive approach in selected ASBO patients when performed by an experienced surgeon. Conclusions. The findings suggest that SPLS is technically feasible and potentially safe in carefully selected patients with ASBO when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, prospective comparative studies are required to confirm its advantages over conventional laparoscopic or open approaches.