Regional sizing system for adolescent cadet uniforms: A Kazakhstan study

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2026.104003
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background Current sizing standards for occupational uniforms in Kazakhstan military training institutions are based on outdated anthropometric standards that do not account for regional population variation or contemporary adolescent development patterns. This mismatch results in documented 68% discomfort rates and increased uniform replacement costs. Objective To develop a regional anthropometric framework for industrial uniform design and procurement optimization in geographically distributed military training systems. Methods Anthropometric measurements were obtained from 200 male cadets representing four geographically diverse regions (Almaty, Shymkent, Karaganda, and Pavlodar (50 people per region) with a control group of 80 schoolchildren. Seven critical parameters (height, body weight, chest circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, shoulder width and back width) were measured ассоrding to ISO 15535 protocols. Two-way ANOVA assessed regional and age effects. Production-ready sizing specifications were developed based on measured and variance patterns. Results A stable North-South gradient was identified: northern regions (Pavlodar, Karaganda) exceed southern regions (Almaty, Shymkent) by 2.94 cm in shoulder width (41.96 ± 1.72 vs. 39.02 ± 1.47, p < 0.001), 2.32 cm in back width (p < 0.001) and 2.81 cm in chest circumference (p = 0.008). Regional growth velocity varied by approximately 60% (7.44 cm vs. 12.04 cm height increase during ages 14-17), necessitating adaptive design features and differentiated replacement cycles (12-18 months for high-velocity regions; 24-30 months for stable regions). Conclusions Regional anthropometric variation requires differential manufacturing strategies: northern facilities should prioritize 'M' sizes, southern facilities 'XS-S′, achieving approximately 90% population coverage. Traditional mobile anthropometry (ICC>0.95) provides a reliable alternative to 3D scanning for industrial sizing in diverse geographical terrains. Practical application The anthropometric database (1960 data points) enables immediate industrial implementation through inventory reallocation, achieving a projected 35% reduction in procurement costs. The framework is transferable to other adolescent programs and institutional uniform systems in geographically diverse regions.