ТАРИХИ УРБАНИСТІК КЕҢІСТІКТЕГІ ДӘСТҮР МЕН ЖАҢАШЫЛДЫҚТЫҢ ДИАЛЕКТИКАСЫ: ТАРАЗ ҚАЛАСЫНЫҢ МӘДЕНИ КЕҢІСТІГІН ФИЛОСОФИЯЛЫҚ ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯЛАУ

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48010/5xk8m326
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of the dialectic of tradition and innovation in historical urban space. The core of the problem lies in the fact that urban environments are not only material infrastructures but also symbolic spaces where cultural memory and historical experience are accumulated. In the context of globalization, urban development transforms cultural codes, yet this does not imply their disappearance; instead, they are reinterpreted and adapted to new social conditions. The author’s position is based on understanding tradition and innovation as a dialectical unity: tradition ensures the continuity of cultural meanings, while innovation enables their reinterpretation in accordance with contemporary realities. The solution to the problem is proposed through the philosophical interpretation of urban space as a cultural text, analyzing its historical and symbolic meanings. Using the cultural space of Taraz city as an example, concepts of collective memory and “sites of memory” are examined, revealing mechanisms of cultural continuity. This approach contributes to understanding the humanitarian dimension of urban development and may serve as a theoretical foundation for cultural policies aimed at preserving historical heritage and integrating it into modern processes.