КВАДРАТ ТЕҢСІЗДІКТЕРДІ ОҚЫТУДА ЦИФРЛЫҚ БІЛІМ БЕРУ РЕСУРСТАРЫН ҚОЛДАНУ ТИІМДІЛІГІ

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53360/3135-8160-2026-2(6)-2
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the effectiveness of digital educational resources in teaching quadratic inequalities. A comparative study of WolframAlpha and Symbolab platforms was conducted, focusing on their pedagogical, technical, and educational outcomes. This study builds on the foundational work of earlier researchers and advances the discourse by presenting new comparisons and conclusions. The authors evaluated the platform's capabilities through practical tasks informed by theoretical insights into the effectiveness of teaching mathematics using visual and dynamic resources, as articulated in the works of Rahman, Yilmaz, and Tall. Furthermore, the trends in digital education highlighted in Kazakhstani research enhance the relevance of this work.The results showed that the WolframAlpha and Symbolab programs showed the best learning results due to the clarity of the solution steps and high graphical accuracy. Based on the data obtained, it is concluded that combining digital platforms with traditional teaching methods helps to increase students' interest in the subject, develop logical thinking and form the skills of a reasoned presentation of their conclusions.