A structured online learning model based on active learning strategies: design and experimental evaluation in teacher education

Dana Shrymbay, Elvira Adylbekova

Data confidence 70 medium

How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction Online learning effectiveness depends on pedagogical design rather than platform capabilities. This study evaluates the BOOOM model (Boosting Cognition, Online Collaboration, Organizing Instruction, Overseeing Metacognition, Motivating) in teacher education. Methods A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design was employed with 90 students (Group B: experimental, n = 45; Group A: control, n = 45) over 12 weeks in Google Classroom. Data were collected through achievement tests, engagement scales, self-efficacy scales, satisfaction questionnaires, and interviews. Results The BOOOM model exerted a statistically significant positive effect on academic achievement, cognitive and behavioral engagement, and pedagogical self-efficacy: F(1, 87) = 28.54, p < .001, partial η ² = .247. No significant differences were found for emotional engagement or platform usability. Discussion The effectiveness of online learning depends more on the quality of pedagogical design than on the platform itself. The BOOOM model is proposed as a practical structured approach for active learning in teacher education.