ТҮРІК ТІЛДЕРІНІҢ ОРТАҚ ТЕРМИНҚОРЫН ҚАЛЫПТАСТЫРУ НЕГІЗДЕРІ

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.62724/202620203
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the historical prerequisites for the formation of a common terminological fund of Turkic languages, its theoretical foundations, and practical approaches to its implementation. The study is based on early 20th-century Turkological research, as well as the materials of the 1924 Congress of Kazakh Scholars in Orenburg and the 1926 Baku Turkological Congress. It analyzes the impact of Soviet language policy on the alphabets, orthography, and terminological systems of Turkic peoples, and identifies the reasons for the delayed development of a common terminological fund. The principles of term formation in Kazakh, Azerbaijani, and other Turkic languages are compared, and the internal and external sources for enriching the common Turkic terminological fund are systematized. In addition, mechanisms for the selection, unification, approval, and standardization of common terms are proposed. The results of the study contribute to the expansion of the shared Turkic scientific space, enhance mutual understanding among related peoples, and support the harmonization of the language of science. The author emphasizes that the success of this process depends on common principles and consistent institutional coordination; therefore, the issue should be addressed systematically and collaboratively at the international level.