Gallium Leaching from Fly Ash A Mini-Review

Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36547/ams.32.2.2274
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Gallium (Ga) occurrence in coal is interpreted only by coupling bulk partitioning with microscale residence. Ga distribution reflects allocation between inorganic matter and organics and links to ash yield. Al-bearing aluminosilicates dominate as hosts, with Ga retained mainly by isomorphic substitution governed by crystal chemistry rather than adsorption. Workflows compare where Ga sits versus how it is bound: density fractionation and sequential/selective leaching, constrained by XRD and supported by BSE–EDS, EMPA, and LA–ICP–MS. During combustion, Ga concentrates in fly ash/slag; recovery relies on pretreatment, acid leaching, and sorption/stripping, with calcination/roasting disrupting refractory frameworks, boosting extraction, and controlling impurity co-dissolution.