Intensification of non-ferrous metal leaching: a mini-review with emphasis on zinc recovery technologies

Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36547/ams.32.2.2275
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This review examines technological and resource factors governing zinc production route selection. The mineralogical form of zinc is identified as the primary flowsheet design criterion: sulfide ores require oxidative pretreatment, whereas non-sulfide ores undergo acid leaching but risk silica gelation. Pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical pathways are compared regarding metal purity, energy intensity, and residue management. Modern intensification methods – microwave pretreatment, ultrasonic cavitation, and surfactant-assisted autoclave leaching – are evaluated as tools targeting distinct rate-limiting stages: matrix liberation, boundary-layer mass transfer, surface passivation. Cross-referencing with recent advances in copper bioleaching and gold microflotation confirms the universal nature of underlying physicochemical barriers.