COHORT STUDIES IN MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH

2016

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.33396/1728-0869-2016-4-56-64
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents the main methodological principles of planning, implementation and statistical analysis of data from cohort studies. Types of cohort studies, their main advantages and disadvantages, and practical examples of cohort studies in medicine and public health are also presented. We also present the main measures used in cohort studies, namely, the incidence, cumulative incidence, incidence density, absolute risk, relative risk, attributable risk and attributable risk fraction in a given cohort and in a population, incidence rate ratio and incidence rate difference. Examples of cohort studies in literature, including examples from Arkhangelsk region are presented and discussed. The methods of sample size calculation using "EpiInfoTM" software and calculation of the measures of association in cohort studies are also shown using examples from real studies. This is an introductory article about the main methodological principles of cohort study design in health sciences and it does not substitute specialized literature in clinical epidemiology.