Secularity and the Foundations of Religious studies in Kazakhstan: a critical analysis of state-sponsored pedagogy and securitized secularism

Cogent Arts and Humanities, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/23311983.2026.2694223
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article critically examines the mandatory course ‘Secularity and the Foundations of Religious Studies’ in Kazakhstan’s secondary education system, analyzing how state-sponsored pedagogy reflects a shift from post-Soviet liberalization to securitized secularism. Utilizing qualitative content analysis of mandatory ninth-grade textbooks and synthesizing frameworks of assertive secularism, the religion-state gap, and governmentality, this study demonstrates how the state utilizes curriculum ideology to manage public religiosity. The analysis traces how the 2011 Law on Religious Activity institutionalized a restrictive regime under the international branding of the ‘Kazakhstan model’ of interfaith harmony. By decoding textbook taxonomies of ‘traditional’ versus ‘non-traditional’ confessions and establishing regional benchmarks—particularly with Uzbekistan’s parallel trajectory—the paper argues that this curriculum functions as a defensive civic mechanism designed to preempt radicalization while establishing state authority over theological discourse. Rather than fostering open-ended pluralism, this pedagogical approach implants institutional vigilance within students. Ultimately, the findings contribute to global debates on how assertive secular states instrumentalize public education to construct self-regulating secular subjects and navigate the tension between constitutional neutrality and the active management of spiritual life.