ASSESSING THE SUFFICIENCY OF A 500-WORD VOCABULARY THRESHOLD FORCRITICAL READING OF LITERARY TEXTS IN ENGLISH

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53360/3135-8160-2025-2(2)-7
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines whether a 500-word vocabulary threshold, considered as aminimal lexical level, is sufficient for developing critical reading skills of literary texts in Englishamong secondary school students. The study is based on a comparative analysis of an experimentallist of 500 words by Matveev, and the official Oxford 3000 frequency list (by CEFR levels), as wellas an assessment of comprehension of an adapted literary text fragment from an 8th-grade textbook.It was found that approximately 95% of the experimental list words are included in the official Oxford3000 list, and that mastering this vocabulary allows understanding 86.6% of the words in theanalyzed text, providing an acceptable level of semantic comprehension. The evaluation of contenttransmission demonstrated a sufficient level of text perception despite the limited vocabulary. Theresults indicate that the 500-word lexical threshold is minimally sufficient for the development ofcritical reading skills at the initial stage of learning English, which has practical implications forforeign language teaching methodology.